Thursday, December 9, 2010

Quilt Club assists Putnam Co. Farm Bureau



The "One Stitch At A Time" Putnam County Purdue Extension Homemakers Quilt Club recently developed a quilt block for the Indiana Farm Bureau Inc. quilt to be auctioned off at the last session of the December Annual Meeting. Each of Indiana's 92 counties was asked to contribute a block to be added to the quilt. The quilt block represents agriculture in the county and has the county name on the block. Pictured from left to right are -- First row, Bonnie Bryan and Julie Burns; Second row, Jean Beilby, Beth Evans, Clair Winings, Dorlis Deaton, Sharon Black.
Putnam County Farm Bureau Inc., would like to thank this new club for its contribution towards the state wide quilt block. The "One Stitch At A Time" Purdue Extension Quilt club is a new club. If anyone would be interested in joining the group, or finding out more information about the quilt club, please contact Bonnie Bryan at765.739.6101 or the Purdue Extension Putnam County office at 765.653.8411.

Monday, December 6, 2010

State FB Convention

State Farm Bureau Convention will be held this friday and saturday in the Indianapolis Convention Center. Go to www.infarmbureau.org website to veiw the program.

Lactose Intolerance people still need milk!!!!!

Change perception of lactose-free milk.
Identify opportunities to increase lactose-free milk consumption, encourage use and grow the lactose-free category.
Address myths and misperceptions of lactose-free milk related to its nutritional value and taste and show that lactose-free milk is “real milk”.
Many individuals with real or perceived lactose intolerance avoid dairy and thus fail to take in adequate amounts of calcium, vitamin D and other essential nutrients, according to a National Institutes of Health consensus report. This avoidance may predispose them to decreased accrual of bone mass and subject them to increased risk of osteoporosis and other adverse health outcomes. In most cases, individuals do not need to eliminate dairy consumption. “There is a huge opportunity to change attitudes and strategies and make sure people who are lactose intolerant are aware of dairy-first solutions,” says Jim Layne, vice president of Dairy Management Inc.’s, strategic initiatives team. “ Moovision.com is a light-hearted approach that gives people a platform to talk about a very personal condition. We want to engage them, retain them and give them the chance to reach out to other people.”

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Monsanto Fund impacting rural communities.

Indiana Farmers Can Make an Impact in their Community in More Ways than One. Have you ever wanted to be the local hero in your community? Would you like to show everyone how much your town means to you? The Monsanto Fund wants to help you make an impact in Rural America. Indiana farmers in 83 counties have the opportunity to win $2,500 for their favorite nonprofit organization. The donations are available through the Monsanto Fund’s America’s Farmers Grow Communities SM program.The program’s first two pilots provided nearly $1.2 million to farmers in 10 states with $2,500 donations going to a farmer’s favorite nonprofit. The second pilot alone benefited 298 organizations, with 35 percent of the awards going to agriculture youth groups; 24 percent directed toward community organizations such as food banks; and 15 percent donated to various educational programs. With the success of the first two pilots, the program has expanded and now expects to contribute more than $3 million in more than 1,200 counties across 38 states. You might be asking, “What can $2,500 do for my community?” According to previous winners, the answer is,“Plenty!” Click on the link below for a closer look into the many ways $2,500 can help your community. http://www.monsanto.com/americasfarmers/Pages/grow-communities.aspx The America’s Farmers Grow Communities program benefits nonprofit community groups such as youth organizations, schools and other civic groups important to America’s farmers. Farmers can apply online at http://www.growcommunities.com/, or they can call 1.877.267.3332 to apply by phone. Farmers, age 21 and over, who are actively engaged in farming a minimum of 250 acres of corn, soybeans and/or cotton, or 40 acres of open field vegetables, or at least 10 acres of tomatoes, peppers and/or cucumbers grown in protected culture are eligible. Farmers can enter now through Dec. 31, 2010. The program is open to all qualifying farmers, and no purchase is necessary in order to enter or win. The Monsanto Fund will randomly draw one winner from each of the participating counties, and announce winning farmers and recipient organizations by February 2011.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Help stop Pepsi from helping HSUS!




Prevent Extremist Group from Capitalizing on Pepsi's Generosity
Background:The Animal Agriculture Alliance is dismayed that the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) has been deemed eligible to compete to win $250,000 in the online Pepsi Refresh Project. Pepsi began the project in January of 2010 with the goal of awarding grants to “innovative and inspiring causes”. Ideas are submitted by individuals, groups, non-profits and businesses with no more than $25 million in revenue. Each month, up to 10 grants are awarded for each denomination of $5,000, $25,000 and $50,000. Two grants of $250,000 are also given. Winners of the grants are selected by public votes on the Pepsi Refresh Project website and text messages. Each month, the projects and organizations competing change and voting restarts.Past winners of $250,000 grants include the Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation, AIDS Research Alliance, Homes of Hope for Children, Inc., Teach for America and the American Legion. Fourteen of the past 17 grants of $250,000 have specifically benefited children and eight of the 17 grants have gone toward medical research.Currently, HSUS is in the top spot to receive a $250,000 grant during the November period. According to the Pepsi Refresh website, HSUS plans to use the funding for “veterinary care, equipment purchases, fleet maintenance, shelter supplies, animal food and travel expenses.” HSUS already has a $100 million budget. Thus, we believe it is already capable of paying for these things without an additional 0.25 percent financial increase.More importantly, HSUS is not affiliated with any local animal shelter. Improving animal welfare is not the main concern of HSUS and other animal rights groups. These extremists are systematically working to prohibit the ownership and use of animals in any way- be it for companionship, entertainment, or food. Most of its money goes towards expensive legislative campaigns and litigation- much of which is aimed at livestock producers.Analysis of its 2008 tax return shows that only one-half of one percent of the group's funds actually went towards caring for animals. This past April, Charity Navigator downgraded its rating of HSUS and its international arm to lower than that of even the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which is generally considered a radical group.Interestingly, the Pepsi Refresh official rules indicate that proposed initiatives cannot “challenge, lobby for or seek to change current laws” or “involve political advocacy”. By applying for this grant, HSUS is unfortunately, and we believe selfishly, taking votes away from organizations that could actually benefit from such a generous donation. The third place group in the running for $250,000 plans to use the grant to fund research on a rare neurological disorder afflicting children. In fourth place is Hanna’s Hope Fund, the only charity worldwide dedicated to exploring and working towards a cure for the deadly genetic disease GAN. Unfortunately, these groups will not receive any funding as long as HSUS continues to dominate the ballot. Another politically-focused organization, Progress Ohio, is currently in the lead in the $50,000 category with a project focused on eliminating antibiotic use in the animal agriculture industry. The group’s proposal includes several inaccurate statements about how livestock are cared for on today’s farms. The Alliance strongly encourages its members and supporters to make an effort to prevent HSUS and Progress Ohio from receiving this money by voting for other, more deserving causes. Registering to vote at www.refresheverything.com is free and takes less than 60 seconds- all that is required is a valid email address. Each person can vote for 10 projects each day through November 30.Get Involved:- Read the Alliance’s letter to Pepsi.- Register to vote for deserving campaigns.- Notify Pepsi of HSUS’ true intentions.- Spread the word on Facebook or Twitter.About the Alliance:The Animal Agriculture Alliance, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, is a broad-based coalition of individual farmers, ranchers, producer organizations, suppliers, packer-processors, scientists, veterinarians, and retailers. The Alliance's mission is to communicate the important role of animal agriculture to our nation's economy, productivity, vitality, and security. The Alliance shows how animal well-being is central to producing safe, high-quality, affordable food and other products essential to our daily lives.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

WTHR investigation on Indiana Jobs

Inflated numbers, secretive contracts surround Indiana jobsUpdated:
wnRenderDate('Monday, November 22, 2010 8:42 PM EST', '', true);
Nov 22, 2010 8:42 PM EST

Enlarge this picture
Unemployed workers meet in Fort Wayne.

Enlarge this picture
Robin Needham's entire family is looking for work.

Enlarge this picture
George VanKirk filed bankruptcy after losing his job.

Enlarge this picture
Bob Segall gets thousands of state job records.

Enlarge this picture
Economist Morton Marcus doesn't trust Indiana job stats.
WTHR found tens of thousands of promised Indiana jobs never showed up. Now 13 Investigates has discovered more inflated job numbers, secretive contracts and conflicting stories that help explain why tens of thousands of unemployed Hoosiers are skeptical and downright angry.
Bob Segall/13 Investigates
Indianapolis - Robin Needham has been looking for work for 18 months, and she's not alone.
Her husband, mother and father are unemployed after losing their jobs last year at the Dalton Corporation foundry in Kendallville. Robin's sister is out of work, too. To help pay the bills, her teenage son and daughter started months ago applying for jobs at the local Pizza Hut, Dairy Queen, McDonald's and Wal-mart but, so far, no one has hired them, either.
"It's an awful position for a parent to be in: to have to go up against your 17-year-old daughter or 16-year-old son and compete with them for a minimum-wage job," Needham says, wiping tears from her cheeks. "I feel angry and hopeless. I feel like a failure as a parent. You want to be able to provide for your kids … but no one's hiring."
The Needhams are among more than a quarter million Hoosiers now looking for jobs.
Jan Peppler was laid off as part of a "restructuring" at her retail job two months ago.
George Van Kirk, a longtime carpenter, has been looking for steady work for more than two years.
"I filed bankruptcy in order to keep my house," he said. "I'm 61 years old, close to retirement, and I have no job and no healthcare."
Robin, Jan, George and a dozen other unemployed workers met with WTHR last week at the Northeast Indiana Central Labor Council in Fort Wayne. They represent a cross section of Indiana jobs -- factory workers, accountants, electricians and medical technicians – and all voiced frustration with the current job market.
"Where are the jobs?"
With state leaders announcing thousands of new Indiana jobs every month, the unemployed workers wonder where those jobs are.
"I'm sure not seeing it. Where are they?" asked Chris Oncheck, an unemployed electrician.
"Show us the jobs because I don't see them out there," added Jan.
"Where are the jobs at? If they're there, where are they at?" echoed Dave Hirschy, an unemployed millwright who has decided to return to school for more training.
Their questions are the same questions 13 Investigates has been asking for the past year -- ever since WTHR discovered empty cornfields and abandoned factories where the state claims there are supposed to be thousands of new jobs.
The Indiana Economic Development Corporation says, in recent years, it's helped attract more than 115,000 new jobs to Indiana. But when WTHR asks for proof to back up the state's numbers, the agency won't provide it.
"We don't share it with the public. We don't release it to the news media. That's confidential information," IEDC chief executive officer Mitch Roob told WTHR earlier this year.
Contracts that don't exist
In an effort to obtain more information about the economic development deals announced by IEDC, WTHR asked to see contracts the agency signed with businesses it describes as "economic successes" – those companies that, according to IEDC, committed to bring new jobs to Indiana.
While IEDC has yet to provide all of the records requested, the information obtained thus far provides valuable insight into hundreds of reported job commitments. Perhaps most telling is not the thousands of pages WTHR has inspected, but the pages that are missing.
Eyewitness News has discovered IEDC never obtained an incentive contract from many of the companies it reported as economic successes. Some of those companies went bankrupt, drastically reduced the number of new employees originally reported to the media, orchestrated creative hiring practices that resulted in only a small net increase in employment, or simply changed their mind and decided not to bring new jobs to Indiana. But for years, IEDC has continued to count those companies – and their original job commitments -- in the agency's official job numbers.
Examples include:
- IEDC announced in 2008 that PEAT International would create dozens of new jobs in Madison County, but the $12 million medical waste incinerator project was in serious trouble even before the announcement. Anderson Mayor Kris Ockomon declared the project dead weeks before IEDC released its 2008 annual report that listed the PEAT incinerator and its 40 proposed jobs as an economic success.
- In Perry County, a quiet boat ramp sits where Tell City Marine said it would create 243 jobs. Those jobs sunk when company investors decided to take their plans across the Ohio River to Kentucky.
- Getrag Transmission Manufacturing declared bankruptcy before it could hire a single Hoosier to assemble dual clutch transmissions. IEDC said the Tipton County project would create 1400 new jobs.
- In Fort Wayne, designer handbag manufacturer Vera Bradley announced in 2008 it would create 490 new jobs, and now says the 627 employees hired since the announcement far exceed the original projection. But in order to create those in-house sewing jobs, more than 600 people were laid off from other sewing companies around Fort Wayne.
IEDC promoted the PEAT International, Tell City Marine, Getrag and Vera Bradley deals in its annual reports and added their original hiring projections to state job totals, even though the real number of new jobs created was far less than projected. WTHR has not seen a signed incentive agreement for any of those projects among the documents provided for inspection by IEDC.
Conflicting information
In March, IEDC general counsel Shawn Peterson told Eyewitness News that IEDC did not have contracts with any of those companies.
But agency data files provided to WTHR earlier this month offered a conflicting story. IEDC gave WTHR a list of more than 6,500 incentive contracts it claimed to have with companies that brought jobs to Indiana. Companies like Tell City Marine and Getrag appeared on the list. Asked to explain the discrepancy, Peterson again insisted IEDC did not obtain executed incentive contracts from the companies, and blamed a possible "coding error" for the mix-up.
"IEDC is not certifying the complete accuracy of its over 6,500 entries. To do so, the IEDC would need to pull each file to determine whether a particular incentive agreement was fully executed by all parties … While our staff believes that the list [provided to WTHR] is statistically accurate, it is certainly possible that companies may inadvertently appear on that list."
Peterson also said companies receive no taxpayer funded incentives until agreements are fully executed and their performance verified, and some companies that failed to sign incentive contracts offered by IEDC still opted to fulfill their proposed job commitments.
But other businesses say IEDC exaggerated their job numbers, reporting best case scenarios instead of more realistic job projections.
According to IEDC's 2008 annual report, Navistar's Workhorse Custom Chassis committed to add 499 new jobs and $127 million in capital investment at its factory in Randolph County. But 13 Investigates found a letter in IEDC's own files showing the company would commit to far fewer jobs than those later promoted by the state.
In the October 2008 letter sent to IEDC project manager Mindy Kenworthy, Workhorse Custom Chassis' general manager Leon Wolmarans wrote "As stated in previous discussions, Navistar can currently only commit to Phase 1 of this project" which "will require circa $15M investment and create circa 100 new jobs."
Four months later, IEDC published the 499 projection – not 100 – in its annual report, which included a second expansion phase for which the company was not ready to commit.
"In our minds, what we were comfortable with was phase one," Wolmarans told Eyewitness News. "Anything more than that was in a feasibility study, so I don't know who at the state leaked that, but it shouldn't have been listed as a success."
Workhorse Custom Chassis has not added any of the 100 new jobs it hoped to create, and Wolmarans said expansion plans have since been abandoned.
While some of the companies listed as IEDC "economic successes" have hired more workers than expected, infusing hundreds of millions of dollars into the state's economy, many others have laid off far more workers than they hired.
As many as 40% of jobs announced by the state from 2006-2008 have not come, according to an analysis by Eyewitness News. IEDC and Governor Mitch Daniels say they won't give out specific job numbers for any company that has signed an economic incentive agreement with the state.
"Feel like I'm being lied to"
"People like [Gov.] Daniels want to say we've got all this job growth. What's he scared of putting the proof out there for?" asked Adam Lewandowski, who recently lost his job as a roadside tire technician. "Is he afraid that we might find out the truth?"
Chris Oncheck, who's been trying to find a job as an electrician for more than two years, says he is frustrated with the state's secretive position on jobs, too. "I feel a lot like I'm being lied to," he said.
It's easy to understand why.
As the number of job commitments announced by IEDC grows, Indiana's unemployment rate has not gone down. In fact, the state's 10.1% jobless rate is one of the highest in the region. According to the latest report released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics, only Michigan's unemployment rate is higher among Midwestern states.
"Today we have 276,000 fewer people working in Indiana than in 2006," said Morton Marcus, an economic consultant who spent 30 years as director of the Indiana Business Research Center at Indiana University. Marcus says ribbon cuttings by the governor and job announcements by IEDC look good, but often fail to translate into real jobs.
"What we have are press releases and you can't run an economy on press releases, he said. "We need to be founded in reality. That's the issue: how many jobs are actually being created."
State officials won't say – at least not with any specificity. Neighboring states like Illinois and Ohio put all of their job information on their public websites, where the data can be easily accessed at any time. But in Indiana, getting to see state job records can mean waiting a long time.
146 days … and counting
This year alone, WTHR has submitted ten requests under the Indiana Access to Public Records Act. Several of WTHR's requests were denied because the agency said it did not organize its economic development contracts by execution date, and the agency was not willing to provide a report that would show which companies had signed an economic development deal with the state in a particular year.
After WTHR revised its requests, IEDC began allowing access to incentive agreements signed during the past five years. To date, IEDC has released roughly 7,500 pages of contracts – fulfilling approximately 50% of WTHR's request. It has been 146 days since WTHR first asked to see IEDC's incentive agreements. To get the remaining 50%, IEDC says Eyewitness News should expect to wait longer.
"We estimate that we may be in a position to fully and completely satisfy your request in early 2011," Peterson advised WTHR earlier this month. "We cannot proceed in a manner that unreasonably interferes with our agency's regular business, particularly in light of the current economic environment and the IEDC's limited human and fiscal resources."
When IEDC does provide records to 13 Investigates, the agency crosses out job and salary information it doesn't want the public to see. While those same details are made public in many other states, IEDC says it is required to redact the information due to a state law that classifies it as confidential.
To a roomful of unemployed Hoosiers in Fort Wayne, the secrecy adds insult to their injury.
"We're sick and tired of the lies and the crap," Robin Needham said. "None of us want to be in poverty. We want good jobs."
IEDC declined WTHR's request for an interview for this story.

Friday, November 19, 2010

Indiana Court of Appeals retention results....

Indiana Court of Appeals

District
Question
Yes
No
First District
"SHALL JUDGE LLOYD MARK BAILEY BE RETAINED IN OFFICE?"
351566
172193
Second District-
"SHALL JUDGE CALE BRADFORD BE RETAINED IN OFFICE?"
284660
120656
Fourth District
"SHALL JUDGE MELISSA S. MAY BE RETAINED IN OFFICE?"
931022
389323
Fifth District
"SHALL JUDGE ELAINE B. BROWN BE RETAINED IN OFFICE"?
940562
381254
"SHALL JUDGE MARGRET G. ROBB BE RETAINED IN OFFICE"?
922520
391330