Friday, September 28, 2012

HSUS Now Goes After The Pork Checkoff


HSUS Now Goes After The Pork Checkoff

HSUS announced this week a lawsuit against USDA over intellectual property payments the National Pork Board makes to the National Pork Producers Council.
One thing you have to give the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) is that the organization is consistent. HSUS has made it clear – oppose us and you will pay a price.
That’s essentially what HSUS telegraphed when it provided the money and intellectual capital to allow theOrganization for Competitive Markets (OCM) and Mike Callicrate to sue the national beef checkoff. HSUS made it clear the move was payback for the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) having thwarted the HSUS effort in Congress to pass poultry legislation in the 2012 session. Of course, NCBA wasn’t alone; the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) was also instrumental in helping defeat the HSUS legislation.
So it came as no surprise this week when HSUS announced it is suing USDA over the payments that NPPC receives via the national pork checkoff. Admittedly, there was very little of the populist rhetoric that was employed with last month’s lawsuit against the national beef checkoff; there were no claims about protecting the interest of producers, for instance.
HSUS, however, was pretty open that its latest action in the courts is payback for opposing the poultry legislation. HSUS was able to find a single pork producer, as they did with Callicrate in the beef checkoff suit, to serve as a front man for the action.
HSUS’s lawsuit is over the intellectual property payments that the National Pork Board, the USDA-appointed body that oversees the national pork checkoff, makes to the NPPC for the rights to the slogan “Pork, The Other White Meat,” which NPPC owns. HSUS claims the payment is too high and is illegal, as it’s just a way to funnel checkoff dollars toward lobbying, which the Act and Order forbids. But the HSUS press release announcing the lawsuit made it clear that its legal action was mainly payback for NPPC’s support of sow gestation stalls, which HSUS opposes.
The “Other White Meat” campaign is one of the most successful advertising campaigns ever employed by a commodity product. Though the National Pork Board has moved to a new marketing slogan, consumers still identify and remember the tag line, which was replaced with “Pork. Be Inspired” a few years back. In fact, the “White Meat” campaign was so successful that it caused the U.S. beef industry conniptions because it seemed to denigrate red meat at the same time it pushed the acceptability of pork.
I suppose the bottom-line question is whether the agreement for NPPC’s intellectual property is fair or not? Personally, I find the value of phrases, naming rights and intellectual property a little incredulous. At the same time, however, I also acknowledge that the phrase “pink slime” was a game changer for lean finely textured beef. And, obviously, the success of numerous products underscores the effectiveness of the billions spent on marketing slogans.
It’s true that a total of $60 million over 20 years is a lot of money, but we see astronomical figures being paid for the naming rights of sports stadiums and it looks insignificant. Forbes magazine recently published an article estimating the trademark value for companies like Google, AT&T, Apple and GE, and the values ranged from $20-$35 billion dollars – yes, with a “B.”
HSUS is not foolish enough to try and challenge intellectual property right laws, while NPPC has every right to sell the rights to use the slogan it owns. But HSUS will try and make the case that the National Pork Board’s payment to NPPC is designed to circumvent the laws surrounding the checkoff. Much like OCM and Callicrate’s beef lawsuit, the action may not be as much about winning the lawsuit as forcing the opponent to defend it. The defense will likely involve millions of dollars that the pork industry thus won’t be able to spend on lobbying.
The big difference between the pork and beef checkoff lawsuits is that HSUS is actually a party to the pork lawsuit. They have abandoned the rhetoric that HSUS was somehow doing this to benefit producers. If there was ever any doubt, the second suit makes it clear that HSUS is committed to bringing about the demise of the checkoff programs, or at the least harming the entities that have opposed their attacks on the livestock industry. Any dollars siphoned away from these commodity groups in legal defense costs means those dollars aren’t available for use in fighting HSUS in the legislative arena. 
It appears that the beef and pork checkoffs are under a full assault by HSUS, and the entities that represent the largest number of producers will be forced to fight for the checkoffs or give up any role in the checkoff programs. If the activist efforts are successful, the effect is that mainstream producers will have to leave the governance and control of the checkoffs in the hands of a very small minority.
The U.S. pork industry is very concentrated, which means the vast majority of its checkoff assessments originate from a rather limited number of producers. The Pork Act & Order is mandatory, but if it were ever rescinded, the pork industry probably wouldn't find it hard to fund its promotion and research efforts via other means. Ironically, this would be a disaster for HSUS because the restrictions prohibiting lobbying under the current Act & Order would be removed.
The cattle industry, however, would find it much more difficult to fund demand-building activities, given the number of producers. But if HSUS is successful in eliminating any input by mainstream producers, it’s likely the beef industry might look at alternative funding resources as well. 
The logic for the checkoff programs is obvious, and the programs’ successes in building demand has been phenomenal. But it’s doubtful that the large producer groups will be able to continue to spend millions defending these programs from legal attacks from deep-pocketed groups like HSUS. We may see the end of the federally mandated checkoff programs as a result. 

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Meet the Candidates

Putnam County Farm Bureau, Inc. will be hosting a Meet the Candidate Forum at 7 pm on Oct. 9, 2012 in the Community Building at the Putnam County Fairgrounds.  As in the past the candidates will be given time to introduce themselves and answer up to 3 questions of interest to the Agriculture community.  The public in invited and encouraged to attend.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Drought Grain Quality and Availability


2012 DROUGHT: GRAIN QUALITY & AVAILABILITY
BACKGROUND
The 2012 drought has brought on a set of market dynamics that are challenging for the grain industry. A warm, dry
winter led to ideal planting conditions in Indiana through June. A prolonged heat wave coupled with little-to-no rainfall
during prime pollination time caused Indiana’s – and the nation’s – corn crop to suffer. As of September 2, only 22
percent of the U.S. corn crop was rated good-to-excellent (8% in Indiana) with 10 percent of the crop harvested. In
addition to the expected short corn crop, grain quality may be an issue as conditions across the Corn Belt are conducive
for Aspergillus ear rot – a fungus that can produce a mycotoxin called aflatoxin which can harm livestock and humans.
Grain quality and availability will be major topics of discussion throughout the 2012 harvest and beyond. Grain farmers,
users of corn and soybeans (including livestock and biofuels producers), and grain buyers should be prepared.
As the 2012 harvest begins, what are some things to think about when looking to buy grain?
• Consider your grain needs for the year NOW and have a clear, written plan in place that addresses sources of
grain.
• Have a discussion with your local grain merchants NOW if you will need to buy grain this fall and into next year.
• Start your conversation about needing grain with grain merchants that you have done business with in the past.
Grain merchants will work with existing customers (who buy AND sell to them) first before accommodating new
customers.
• While harvest has just begun in Indiana, there are some concerns about grain quality after the difficult growing
season, including the possibility of aflatoxin in the corn crop. You can set quality parameters for the grain you
purchase this fall.
• While there may be grain quality discounts on incoming corn (for grain farmers) at grain elevators this year, this
does not necessarily mean grain will be available at lower prices for those looking to buy from elevators.
Does the Grain Indemnity Fund protect a grain farmer or grain elevator who sells directly to a farmer?
• Grain Elevators are never covered by the Grain Indemnity Fund, it is purely to protect the farmer in the event a
LICENSEE defaults.
• Grain elevator-to-farmer grain transactions are not covered by the Grain Indemnity Fund. This means that grain
merchants will more than likely ask for cash or a letter of credit from farmers seeking to purchase grain.
• Grain merchants may request pre-payment or letters of credit before selling grain directly to farmers, including
livestock operations. This is an unusual circumstance for many grain merchants so some additional steps may be
taken before they are comfortable selling grain to individual farms.
• Farmer-to-farmer grain transactions are not covered by the Grain Indemnity Fund, so if grain is bought this way,
buyers AND sellers need to take that into consideration. The exception is if the farmer buying the grain is
licensed by the Indiana Grain Buyers and Warehouse Licensing Agency (IGBWLA). A complete list of licensed
grain buyers can be found at www.in.gov/isda/2399.htm.
Market drivers are pushing grain farmers and grain merchants to sell at harvest. What does this mean for those
looking to buy grain?
• Plan ahead for future needs when it comes to buying grain this fall.
• If grain is bought at harvest for future use, remember that storage fees will be paid on that grain.
• If a seller does not want to make you an offer for a deferred purchase, offer to buy today and pay storage fees
for future delivery.
What financial conversations should farmers have with the diminished crop this year?
• If you are facing a diminished crop or a lack of available grain to feed livestock, talk with your bank – and other
individuals and businesses you work with - about the situation now and what it means for your operation.
• If crop insurance payments for this year’s crop will be used to purchase grain (or other inputs) this fall, a
conversation between the buyer and seller is needed to understand the payment schedule. It is likely a
conversation between the farmer purchasing the grain and his/her bank would be useful under these
circumstances. The bank may need to issue a letter or credit, or extend credit based on the crop insurance.
What are some things for livestock farmers to keep in mind with the possibility of aflatoxin in the corn crop?
• Livestock farmers should consider testing corn that will be fed to be sure aflatoxin levels are in an acceptable
range. Approved labs for submitting corn samples are listed at
http://www.rma.usda.gov/fields/il_rso/2012/aflatoxin.pdf.
• There are quick tests that can be used to immediately to check for aflatoxin. Quick tests are not intended to
replace laboratory analysis, but can serve as a valuable resource to determine if aflatoxin is present.
o Charm Sciences Inc. - http://www.charm.com/
o EnviroLogix, Inc. - http://envirologix.com/
o Neogen Corporation - http://www.neogen.com/
o R-Biopharm - http://www.r-biopharm.com/
o Romer -http://www.romerlabs.com/
o Thermo Fisher Scientific Diagnostic - http://www.thermofisher.com/global/en/home.asp
o Vicam - http://vicam.com/
o A complete list of USDA approved quick tests can be found at www.gipsa.usda.gov/fgis/techservsup/
metheqp/GIPSA_Approved_Mycotoxin_Rapid_Test_Kits.pdf
• Livestock farmers need to remember that if aflatoxin is present in the corn, co-products (including DDGs) will
also be affected.
• If your corn tests positive for aflatoxin, consult your nutritionist to see about of developing a strategy for feeding
the contaminated corn. There might be a possibility to use some of the lesser quality corn depending on the
levels of aflatoxin present and the type of livestock you are feeding.
• Once there is aflatoxin in the grain, it doesn't get better in storage. This means that more corn may be sold at
harvest and that if stored corn is purchased, you need to have it tested before feeding it to your animals.
For more information, contact Indiana Corn Marketing Council and Indiana Soybean Alliance at 1-800-735-0195 or
visit www.incorn.org and www.indianasoybean.com.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Farm Bill Rally


Hoosiers Among Hundreds to Attend Farm Bill Rally

Posted on 12 September 2012 by Gary Truitt
AFBF President Bob Stallman speaks at Farm Bill Now rally
Hundreds of farmers, ranchers, and supporters of agriculture gathered in the shadow of the Capitol in Washington, DC on Wednesday; and, like most rallies on the Mall, the Farm Bill Now rally was loud and proud. With chants of “Farm Bill Now,” the group waved signs and listened to a variety of speakers all calling for action on a new Farm Bill. Gary Niemeyer, President of the National Corn Growers, told the crowd the rally was not about politics but about getting a Farm Bill done, “I got off my combine and came here for one reason: to tell Congress to do their job.” He said it is time to put politics aside, “Farm policy has always not only been bi-partisan but non-partisan.”  Yet, it is politics that is holding up action on a new Farm Bill. Tom Buis, with Growth Energy, said that, with lawmakers only in town for a few more days, it is unlikely a new Farm Bill can be acted on before the current one expires at the end of this month.


In Congressman Joe Donnelly talks with Indiana farmers after the Farm Bill Now rally
After the rally broke up, many of those in attendance went to Capitol Hill to visit their Congressmen to deliver the message one-on-one. A delegation of Indiana Farm Bureau members attended the rally; and a number of lawmakers also attended the rally, including Indiana Congressman Joe Donnelly. Following the rally, he released a statement that said: “Hoosier farmers deserve a vote on the Farm Bill now. Farmers face an incredible amount of uncertainty, whether it is from Mother Nature or market prices. We cannot allow the inaction of Congress to be another cause for concern. Republicans and Democrats should come together and pass a Farm Bill before it expires. Our agriculture community has been a powerful economic force in recent years. We cannot afford further inaction.”

National Farmers Union President Roger Johnson co-hosted the rally with American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman. They were joined on stage by many members of Congress and leaders from a broad spectrum of supporting organizations. “We are all united on one thing; we need a farm bill and we need a farm bill now,” said Johnson. “Perhaps never in the history of farm legislation have so many diverse farmer and rancher voices joined together for such a common call for action on a farm bill,” said Stallman during the event. “We gather here under a banner adorned with three words. FARM. BILL. NOW. And we are here to raise our voices toward Capitol Hill…for a shared purpose.”

Indiana farmer and NACD President Gene Schmidt addresses Farm Bill Now rally
National Milk Producers Federation First Vice Chairman Ken Nobis, a dairy farmer from St. John, MI, told those assembled that politics shouldn’t stand in the way of helping America’s farmers. “Dairy farmers have worked with Democrats and Republicans, in the Senate and the House, to create a farm bill that saves taxpayers money, and at the same time offers dairy producers a more effective safety net when times are tough,” Nobis said. “It would be a tragic mistake, after this bill has already passed the Senate, and the House Agriculture Committee, to let it wither and die on the political vine, rather than make the necessary effort to get it passed in the coming weeks.”

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-MI, chairwoman of the Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee; Sen. Jerry Moran, R-KS; Rep. Collin Peterson, D-MN, ranking member of the Committee on Agriculture; and Rep. Kristi Noem, R-SD, also addressed the crowd.




Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Ag Outlook for 2013


Webinar to give agricultural outlook for coming year
By Amanda Gee
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. - Purdue Extension will host a free webinar to help farmers and others in agriculture make better business decisions following the worst drought in decades.
Purdue Extension agricultural economist Corinne Alexander will present "Agricultural Outlook 2013" Thursday (Sept. 13) at 8:30 a.m. (EDT). Participants with high-speed Internet access can find the program at https://gomeet.itap.purdue.edu/outlook/.
The webinar, designed for farmers, landowners, input suppliers and anyone interested in the future of agriculture, will include price outlook and marketing strategies for the coming year.